US tariff policy ‘hasn’t changed’ despite supreme court ruling, trade chief says
#Trump tariffs #Supreme Court ruling #Trade policy #Jamieson Greer #Global tariff #Trade deals #Economic policy #Congress authority
📌 Key Takeaways
- US trade negotiator insists tariff policy unchanged despite Supreme Court ruling Trump tariffs illegal
- Administration maintains deals with UK, EU and others despite court decision
- Trump announced new 15% global tariff using different legal framework after court ruling
- Court ruled that tariff authority during peacetime belongs to Congress, not president
📖 Full Retelling
US trade negotiator Jamieson Greer insisted on Sunday that US policy on tariffs 'hasn't changed', two days after the Supreme Court declared many of Donald Trump's tariffs illegal. The ruling issued on Friday by the highest US court was a sharp rebuke to the Republican president that toppled a key pillar of his aggressive economic agenda – even as it prompted Trump to announce a new global tariff using different statutes. Greer told ABC News' 'This Week' that the administration wants to maintain its policy with as much continuity as possible, arguing that it gives US businesses 'a lot of leverage' in world trade. Despite public disapproval, with an ABC/Washington Post/Ipsos poll showing 64% of Americans disapprove of tariffs as an economic strategy, Greer maintained that while legal tools implementing the policy may change, the policy itself remains unchanged. In a separate interview with CBS, Greer confirmed that the US will not back out of tariff deals already sealed with countries including the UK, EU, Japan, Switzerland and others, despite the Supreme Court ruling that tariffs imposed in those deals were illegal. He emphasized that the 15% global tariff Trump announced on Saturday (up from 10% announced on Friday) was distinct from the bilateral agreements struck in the last nine months with around 20 countries, stating 'We want them to understand these deals are going to be good deals. We're going to stand by them. We expect our partners to stand by them.' The Supreme Court's 6-3 ruling determined that a 1977 law designed to address US national emergencies did not provide the legal justification for most of the Trump administration's tariffs, as tariffs typically need to be approved by Congress which has sole authority under the Constitution to levy taxes.
🏷️ Themes
Trade Policy, Legal Challenges, Economic Impact
📚 Related People & Topics
Commercial policy
Government's policy governing international trade
A commercial policy (also referred to as a trade policy or international trade policy) is a government's policy governing international trade. Commercial policy is an all encompassing term that is used to cover topics which involve international trade. Trade policy is often described in terms of a ...
Jamieson Greer
American trade official (born 1979 or 1980)
Jamieson Lee Greer (born 1979 or 1980) is an American government official, attorney and former Air Force officer who is serving as the 20th United States trade representative in the second Trump administration since February 2025. A member of the Republican Party, he previously served in the first T...
Tariffs in the Trump administration
Topics referred to by the same term
Tariffs in the Trump administration could refer to:
Entity Intersection Graph
Connections for Commercial policy:
🌐
Tariffs in the Trump administration
41 shared
🌐
Supreme court
18 shared
🌐
Tariff
7 shared
👤
State of the Union
5 shared
🌐
Executive (government)
5 shared
Original Source
US tariff policy ‘hasn’t changed’ despite supreme court ruling, trade chief says Jamieson Greer also said US won’t pull out of deals with UK, EU and others after court declared Trump tariffs illegal Top US trade negotiator Jamieson Greer insisted on Sunday that US policy on tariffs “hasn’t changed”, two days after the supreme court declared many of Donald Trump ’s tariffs illegal. The ruling issued on Friday by the highest US court was a sharp rebuke to the Republican president that toppled a key pillar of his aggressive economic agenda – even as it prompted Trump to announce a new global tariff using different statutes, albeit temporary. “The reality is, we want to maintain the policy we have, have as much continuity as possible, make sure that business understands this is the direction we’ve been going. We’re going to continue going this way,” Greer told the ABC News Sunday politics show This Week. ABC host Martha Raddatz asked Greer about the government’s persistence despite the unpopularity of the policy with the public, citing an ABC/Washington Post/Ipsos poll that showed 64% of those surveyed in the US disapproved of tariffs as an economic strategy. “The policy hasn’t changed. The legal tools that implement that may change but the policy hasn’t changed,” he said, arguing that it gives US business “a lot of leverage” in world trade . Greer also said in a separate interview with CBS that the US will not back out of tariff deals it has already sealed with a number of countries around the world including the UK , the EU, Japan , Switzerland and others, even though the supreme court ruled that tariffs imposed in those deals were illegal. He said that the 15% global tariff Trump announced on Saturday, up from 10% announced on Friday in the immediate aftermath of the court ruling, was distinct from the bilateral agreements struck in the last nine months with around 20 countries. “We want them to understand these deals are going to be good deals,” Greer said. “We’re g...
Read full article at source