SP
BravenNow
Geodesic Gradient Descent: A Generic and Learning-rate-free Optimizer on Objective Function-induced Manifolds
| USA | technology | ✓ Verified - arxiv.org

Geodesic Gradient Descent: A Generic and Learning-rate-free Optimizer on Objective Function-induced Manifolds

#Geodesic Gradient Descent #optimizer #learning-rate-free #manifolds #gradient descent #objective function #convergence #parameter updates

📌 Key Takeaways

  • Geodesic Gradient Descent is a new optimization algorithm that eliminates the need for manual learning rate tuning.
  • It operates on manifolds induced by the objective function, using geodesics for parameter updates.
  • The method is generic and applicable to a wide range of optimization problems without requiring learning rates.
  • It aims to improve convergence and stability by leveraging geometric properties of the optimization landscape.

📖 Full Retelling

arXiv:2603.06651v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Euclidean gradient descent algorithms barely capture the geometry of objective function-induced hypersurfaces and risk driving update trajectories off the hypersurfaces. Riemannian gradient descent algorithms address these issues but fail to represent complex hypersurfaces via a single classic manifold. We propose geodesic gradient descent (GGD), a generic and learning-rate-free Riemannian gradient descent algorithm. At each iteration, GGD uses

🏷️ Themes

Optimization Algorithms, Machine Learning

Entity Intersection Graph

No entity connections available yet for this article.

Deep Analysis

Why It Matters

This research matters because it introduces a novel optimization algorithm that eliminates the need for manual learning rate tuning, which is a major pain point in machine learning and deep learning. It affects researchers, data scientists, and engineers who work with optimization problems across various domains including neural networks, computer vision, and scientific computing. By providing a learning-rate-free approach on objective function-induced manifolds, this could significantly reduce the time and expertise required to train complex models while potentially improving convergence properties.

Context & Background

  • Traditional gradient descent algorithms require careful tuning of learning rates, which significantly impacts convergence speed and final solution quality.
  • Manifold optimization has gained attention in recent years as many machine learning problems naturally lie on Riemannian manifolds rather than Euclidean spaces.
  • Previous attempts at learning-rate-free optimization include methods like AdaGrad, Adam, and their variants, but these still have hyperparameters that require tuning.
  • Geodesic approaches have been explored in specific domains like matrix completion and computer vision, but a generic framework has been lacking.
  • The concept of using the geometry induced by the objective function itself represents a paradigm shift from traditional Euclidean optimization methods.

What Happens Next

Researchers will likely implement and test this algorithm on benchmark datasets and compare performance against established optimizers like SGD, Adam, and AdaGrad. The method may be incorporated into major deep learning frameworks like PyTorch and TensorFlow if empirical results demonstrate advantages. Further theoretical analysis will explore convergence guarantees and computational complexity. Applications in specific domains like reinforcement learning, natural language processing, and scientific computing will be investigated over the next 6-12 months.

Frequently Asked Questions

What makes this optimizer 'learning-rate-free'?

The algorithm uses the geometry induced by the objective function itself to determine step sizes along geodesics, eliminating the need for manually specified learning rates that require tuning in traditional gradient descent methods.

What types of problems benefit most from this approach?

Problems with complex geometry, non-convex objectives, or where manual hyperparameter tuning is particularly costly would benefit most, including deep neural network training, matrix factorization, and optimization on manifolds like the sphere or Stiefel manifold.

How does this differ from adaptive gradient methods like Adam?

While Adam adapts learning rates per parameter using historical gradient information, this method uses the intrinsic geometry of the objective function's induced manifold to determine step sizes along geodesic paths, representing a fundamentally different geometric approach.

What are the computational requirements of this method?

The method requires computing geodesics on the induced manifold, which may involve solving differential equations or approximations, potentially increasing computational cost per iteration compared to standard gradient descent.

Has this been tested on real-world problems?

As a newly proposed theoretical framework, extensive empirical validation on benchmark problems is still needed, though the paper likely includes preliminary experiments demonstrating the concept's viability.

}
Original Source
arXiv:2603.06651v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Euclidean gradient descent algorithms barely capture the geometry of objective function-induced hypersurfaces and risk driving update trajectories off the hypersurfaces. Riemannian gradient descent algorithms address these issues but fail to represent complex hypersurfaces via a single classic manifold. We propose geodesic gradient descent (GGD), a generic and learning-rate-free Riemannian gradient descent algorithm. At each iteration, GGD uses
Read full article at source

Source

arxiv.org

More from USA

News from Other Countries

🇬🇧 United Kingdom

🇺🇦 Ukraine