How war stopped working
#warfare ineffectiveness #military failure #modern conflicts #nuclear deterrence #democratic defense #geopolitical analysis #military strategy
📌 Key Takeaways
- Major powers are increasingly failing to achieve decisive victories in modern warfare
- Both democratic and autocratic aggressors struggle with military effectiveness
- The proliferation of weapons and fear of nuclear escalation have changed warfare dynamics
- Democracies risk becoming under-defended if public support for military wanes due to poor outcomes
📖 Full Retelling
Journalist Janan Ganesh published an analysis on February 25, 2026, examining the growing ineffectiveness of military force in modern conflicts, drawing evidence from failed campaigns in Ukraine, Iraq, and Afghanistan where major powers have struggled to achieve decisive victories. The article opens with observations about war museums displaying defeated military hardware, suggesting a pattern of consistent military failure across different eras and conflicts. When asked when a major state last unambiguously won a land war, the author points to Desert Storm in 1991 as a possible example, though noting it was largely settled from the air, and suggests that truly decisive victories have become increasingly rare in modern warfare. This trend of military frustration affects both democratic and autocratic aggressors, wars close to home and those on distant continents, and conflicts against both sovereign states and irregular forces. While acknowledging some successes of air power alone, such as the ousting of Slobodan Milošević and the beating back of ISIS, the author points out their limitations, as seen in the aftermath of Libya where the west lost control after toppling Gaddafi without ground forces. The article explores several explanations for this military ineffectiveness, including the wider proliferation of means of violence that allow smaller entities to defend themselves, the shift from conventional battles to 'wars amongst the people,' and the inhibiting effect of nuclear escalation fears. As for consequences, the author speculates that war might become less common as states recognize the costs outweigh benefits, but powerful states might still attempt force in their spheres of influence. Democracies particularly risk becoming under-defended if public support for military action wanes due to decades of poor outcomes, potentially leading to civilian estrangement from military institutions. In what was once a moralizing slogan, 'there are no winners in war' now has the ring of a descriptive sentence in the 21st century.
🏷️ Themes
Military Ineffectiveness, Geopolitical Shifts, Democratic Security Challenges
Entity Intersection Graph
No entity connections available yet for this article.
Original Source
How war stopped working on x (opens in a new window) How war stopped working on facebook (opens in a new window) How war stopped working on linkedin (opens in a new window) How war stopped working on whatsapp (opens in a new window) Save How war stopped working on x (opens in a new window) How war stopped working on facebook (opens in a new window) How war stopped working on linkedin (opens in a new window) How war stopped working on whatsapp (opens in a new window) Save Janan Ganesh Published February 25 2026 Jump to comments section Print this page Stay informed with free updates Simply sign up to the Geopolitics myFT Digest -- delivered directly to your inbox. To enter the War Remnants Museum in Ho Chi Minh City, visitors pass an old US Army helicopter. In fact, the whole courtyard is given over to menacing but ultimately futile hardware from the American arsenal of the mid-20th century. The implied message — “This was not enough to beat us” — is unsubtle. One day, Kyiv might have a museum full of the Russian materiel that failed to subdue Ukraine. The Taliban could certainly show off the gear that was left behind after two decades of botched foreign occupation in Afghanistan. As for Iraq, imagine all the “remnants” from the US misadventure there. When did a major state last unambiguously win a land war on a significant scale? Desert Storm in 1991, perhaps, but it was settled to a great extent from the air. The Iran-Iraq war was inconclusive. The Soviets lost in Afghanistan before the west did. France gave up on Operation Barkhane, its counterinsurgent mission in the Sahel, in 2022. You are left to cite Russia’s invasion of Georgia (population 4.4mn at the time), the still-evolving situation in Gaza and the Falklands war, which happened nearer to the second world war than to the present. The world seems to be living through a trend that, if it holds, could scarcely be more profound: the increasing ineffectiveness of war. There is a pattern of military failure, or...
Read full article at source