Interactive Benchmarks
#interactive #benchmarks #performance #metrics #evaluation
📌 Key Takeaways
- The article discusses the concept of 'Interactive Benchmarks' but lacks detailed content for a full summary.
- No specific examples, applications, or outcomes of interactive benchmarks are provided in the given text.
- The title and content are minimal, preventing extraction of substantive key points.
- Further information is needed to understand the significance or context of interactive benchmarks.
📖 Full Retelling
arXiv:2603.04737v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Standard benchmarks have become increasingly unreliable due to saturation, subjectivity, and poor generalization. We argue that evaluating model's ability to acquire information actively is important to assess model's intelligence. We propose Interactive Benchmarks, a unified evaluation paradigm that assesses model's reasoning ability in an interactive process under budget constraints. We instantiate this framework across two settings: Interactive
🏷️ Themes
Benchmarking, Technology
Entity Intersection Graph
No entity connections available yet for this article.
Original Source
--> Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence arXiv:2603.04737 [Submitted on 5 Mar 2026] Title: Interactive Benchmarks Authors: Baoqing Yue , Zihan Zhu , Yifan Zhang , Jichen Feng , Hufei Yang , Mengdi Wang View a PDF of the paper titled Interactive Benchmarks, by Baoqing Yue and 5 other authors View PDF Abstract: Standard benchmarks have become increasingly unreliable due to saturation, subjectivity, and poor generalization. We argue that evaluating model's ability to acquire information actively is important to assess model's intelligence. We propose Interactive Benchmarks, a unified evaluation paradigm that assesses model's reasoning ability in an interactive process under budget constraints. We instantiate this framework across two settings: Interactive Proofs, where models interact with a judge to deduce objective truths or answers in logic and mathematics; and Interactive Games, where models reason strategically to maximize long-horizon utilities. Our results show that interactive benchmarks provide a robust and faithful assessment of model intelligence, revealing that there is still substantial room to improve in interactive scenarios. Project page: this https URL Comments: Project Page: this https URL Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) ; Computation and Language (cs.CL); Machine Learning (cs.LG) Cite as: arXiv:2603.04737 [cs.AI] (or arXiv:2603.04737v1 [cs.AI] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.04737 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Yifan Zhang [ view email ] [v1] Thu, 5 Mar 2026 02:18:26 UTC (852 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Interactive Benchmarks, by Baoqing Yue and 5 other authors View PDF TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.AI < prev | next > new | recent | 2026-03 Change to browse by: cs cs.CL cs.LG References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted ...
Read full article at source