Judge scolds Mark Zuckerberg's team for wearing Meta glasses to trial
#Meta glasses #Zuckerberg trial #Social media impact #AI glasses courtroom #Judge Carolyn Kuhl #Facial recognition ban #Social media addiction #Los Angeles court
📌 Key Takeaways
- Judge ordered Meta officials to remove AI glasses from courtroom
- Recording devices are banned in Los Angeles County Superior Court
- Zuckerberg testified about social media platform design for young users
- Plaintiff alleges social media caused addiction and mental health harm
- Judge banned any use of facial recognition technology to identify jurors
📖 Full Retelling
Judge Carolyn Kuhl admonished members of Mark Zuckerberg's team for wearing Ray Ban-Meta AI glasses equipped with cameras as they entered a Los Angeles courtroom on February 19, 2026, for a landmark trial over the impact of social media on children, as recording devices are generally banned in Los Angeles County Superior Court. 'The judge upbraided the Meta team and said if you guys have recorded anything, you have to dispose of it or I will hold you in contempt,' reported Jacob Ward, a technology journalist who witnessed the incident, calling it 'an extraordinary misstep' by Meta. The judge also ordered anyone in the courtroom wearing AI glasses to immediately remove them, specifically noting that any use of facial recognition technology to identify the jurors was strictly prohibited. 'This is very serious,' Judge Kuhl emphasized during the proceedings. The Meta glasses, which retail between $299 and $799, are equipped with a camera capable of taking photos and recording video, raising significant privacy concerns in the courtroom setting. Zuckerberg was present in court to testify as part of a trial examining whether Meta and Alphabet-owned YouTube deliberately designed their social media platforms to encourage compulsive usage among young people. The plaintiff, identified only by her initials 'KGM,' alleges that her early exposure to social media resulted in addiction and subsequent mental health damage, seeking accountability from the tech giants for their platform designs.
🏷️ Themes
Technology Ethics, Legal Proceedings, Social Media Impact, Privacy Concerns
Entity Intersection Graph
No entity connections available yet for this article.
Original Source
MoneyWatch Judge scolds Mark Zuckerberg's team for wearing Meta glasses to social media trial By Mary Cunningham Mary Cunningham Reporter, MoneyWatch Mary Cunningham is a reporter for CBS MoneyWatch. She previously worked at "60 Minutes," CBSNews.com and CBS News 24/7 as part of the CBS News Associate Program. Read Full Bio Mary Cunningham February 19, 2026 / 12:05 PM EST / CBS News Add CBS News on Google A California judge admonished members of Mark Zuckerberg's team for wearing Ray Ban-Meta AI glasses, which are equipped with a camera, as they entered a Los Angeles courtroom on Wednesday for a landmark trial over the impact of social media on children. "The judge upbraided the Meta team and said if you guys have recorded anything, you have to dispose of it or I will hold you in contempt," Jacob Ward, a technology journalist and the host of the Rip Current Podcast, told CBS News, calling the incident "an extraordinary misstep" by Meta. It's unclear if Zuckerberg's team had the glasses on inside the courtroom or how long they were wearing them. Meta did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The use of recording devices and cameras is generally banned in Los Angeles County Superior Court. Judge Carolyn Kuhl, who is presiding over the trial, also ordered anyone in the courtroom wearing AI glasses to immediately remove them, noting that any use of facial recognition technology to identify the jurors was banned. "This is very serious," she said. The court did not immediately respond to a request for additional comment. Meta's glasses, retail for between $299 and $799, are equipped with a camera that can take photos and record video. Zuckerberg was in court to testify as part of a trial over whether Meta and Alphabet-owned YouTube deliberately designed their social media platforms to encourage compulsive usage by young people. The plaintiff behind the suit, identified only by her initials "KGM," alleges that using social media from a young age caused her to b...
Read full article at source