SP
BravenNow
Poor coordination can cost couples an average $14,000 in retirement wealth, research finds
| USA | general | ✓ Verified - cnbc.com

Poor coordination can cost couples an average $14,000 in retirement wealth, research finds

#Retirement savings coordination #401(k) employer match #Couples wealth management #Financial planning couples #Retirement savings optimization #American Economic Review research #Money dates #Financial independence vs coordination

📌 Key Takeaways

  • Couples lose an average $14,000 in retirement wealth due to poor coordination
  • 1 in 5 couples could increase savings by $750 annually by coordinating contributions
  • Couples who coordinate finances better tend to be married longer and shared bank accounts before marriage
  • Regular 'money dates' can help couples identify coordination opportunities
  • The research highlights the difference between coordinated household financial decisions and individual financial management

📖 Full Retelling

Couples in the United States may be losing an average of $14,000 in retirement wealth due to poor coordination on employer retirement plan contributions, according to 2025 research published in the American Economic Review by MIT Sloan finance professor Taha Choukhmane, Treasury Department economist Lucas Goodman, and Yale economics professor Cormac O'Dea, who found that by failing to allocate savings to the spouse with the highest employer match rate, one in five couples could be missing out on $750 in additional annual savings. The research highlights a common oversight where couples don't ask the crucial question 'your 401 or mine?' to determine which spouse's employer offers a more generous retirement contribution match, potentially leaving substantial money on the table throughout their working years. This coordination failure becomes even more significant when considering that for 10% of couples, the missed opportunity could amount to as much as $40,000 in additional retirement wealth by the time they retire. The study distinguishes between couples who coordinate their finances as a household versus those who manage money independently, with the former group achieving better financial outcomes. 'In the latter case, a couple is like roommates living under the same roof, yet make their financial decisions independently,' Choukhmane explained, while coordinated couples optimize their decisions together for maximum benefit. Beyond retirement savings, the research points to other missed opportunities such as one spouse holding high-interest credit card debt while the other maintains idle cash in checking accounts that could be used to reduce the debt burden. 'They could save a lot of money by moving money from the checking account to repay the credit card,' Choukhmane noted, 'but that requires a certain level of trust, of coordination, of agreeing on things, of giving up some independence.' To address these coordination gaps, financial experts recommend that couples establish regular 'money dates' to review their financial status and alignment on goals. Kate Winget, chief revenue officer at Morgan Stanley at Work, suggests couples meet at least twice yearly or even quarterly to identify opportunities for optimizing workplace benefits, retirement contributions, and emergency savings. 'By sitting down regularly, couples have a better chance of identifying time windows when they may be able to apply for certain benefits or increase their contribution amounts,' Winget explained. The research also found that couples who tend to coordinate their finances better typically have been married longer and shared a bank account before marriage, suggesting that financial integration strengthens over time with increased communication and shared financial goals.

🏷️ Themes

Retirement Planning, Financial Coordination, Wealth Optimization, Couples' Finance

Entity Intersection Graph

No entity connections available yet for this article.

}
Original Source
Spouses who don't ask one question — "your 401 or mine?" — could be losing out on retirement money, research finds. By failing to allocate retirement savings to the spouse with the employer that provides the highest match rate , couples may be leaving money on the table, according to 2025 research published in the American Economic Review . By switching retirement contributions to the account with the higher match rate, 1 in 5 couples could increase their savings by an estimated $750 per year, note the research authors: Taha Choukhmane, assistant professor of finance at MIT Sloan School of Management; Lucas Goodman, an economist at the Treasury Department; and Cormac O'Dea, assistant professor of economics at Yale University. More from Women and Wealth: Here's a look at more coverage in CNBC's Women & Wealth special report, which highlights success stories and strategies for women to grow long-term wealth and make informed financial decisions. 93% of women are stressed about money. Building a cash reserve can help How to prepare for the ‘survivor’s penalty’ before a spouse passes ‘Fear is an opportunity,’ expert says. Use what scares you to build wealth By not focusing on the highest match, couples may sacrifice an average of $14,000 in retirement wealth over their lifetime, which may climb to as high as $40,000 in additional wealth at retirement for 10% of couples, according to the research. "The absence of coordination can be a choice, but it's a costly choice," Choukhmane said. Couples who don't sit down and talk about their finances are likely missing gaps like this that they could address, said Kate Winget, chief revenue officer at Morgan Stanley at Work, a provider of equity compensation plans for public and private companies. Which couples tend to coordinate best Choukmane said the research aims to gauge whether couples coordinate their finances as a household or instead manage their money individually. In the latter case, a couple is like roommates living un...
Read full article at source

Source

cnbc.com

More from USA

News from Other Countries

🇬🇧 United Kingdom

🇺🇦 Ukraine