Denmark’s unique political model is in crisis – I blame the boomerang effect | Rune Lykkeberg
📖 Full Retelling
<p>Voters rejected rule from the centre – but could end up with another centrist government</p><p>We could be at the end of the road for the Danish method of democracy. Our style of parliamentary politics has been celebrated and admired internationally for many years, but last week’s general election has left it in crisis. The result was a vote of no confidence in a centrist government led by the Social Democrat Mette Frederiksen. Her administration was, in the Danish context,
Entity Intersection Graph
No entity connections available yet for this article.
Original Source
Denmark’s unique political model is in crisis – I blame the boomerang effect Rune Lykkeberg Voters rejected rule from the centre – but could end up with another centrist government W e could be at the end of the road for the Danish method of democracy. Our style of parliamentary politics has been celebrated and admired internationally for many years, but last week’s general election has left it in crisis. The result was a vote of no confidence in a centrist government led by the Social Democrat Mette Frederiksen. Her administration was, in the Danish context, an unusual political construction. Frederiksen had broken the old pattern of politics in 2022 by forming a governing alliance between the centre-left and centre-right. Yet the most likely outcome of the election is that Denmark will get another centrist government. This is a kind of democratic boomerang. For reasons of perverse parliamentary logic, what the voters reject, they get right back in the face. The paradox could be called the tyranny of the 10%: if 45% of voters in a multiparty system want a government to the left and 45% want a government to the right but 10% vote for parties that want to govern from the centre, it will be very difficult for the old blocs to form governments. This is a new situation in Denmark that will make negotiations to form a new government very challenging. With only one brief and failed exception in the late 1970s, Danish governments have over the past half a century been based either on the left or the right. The historical ideological conflict between their interests has been the organising principle of Danish parliamentary politics and it has produced a remarkable combination of legitimacy and efficiency. We never operated an institutionalised “ firewall ” as in Germany or a consensual “ cordon sanitaire ” as in France. The conviction widely shared in Danish politics is that you deal with the forces that in other democracies would be shunned as populists by offering them a ...
Read full article at source