SP
BravenNow
‘Fossil-fuel imperialism’: Trump’s hankering for Iranian oil runs deep
| United Kingdom | business | ✓ Verified - theguardian.com

‘Fossil-fuel imperialism’: Trump’s hankering for Iranian oil runs deep

📖 Full Retelling

<p>Experts say the US believes it is entitled to resources it desires – a perspective president has supported for decades</p><p>Donald Trump said this past weekend he wants to “take the oil in Iran” by seizing control of a key export hub, echoing a refrain he has returned to for over a decade.</p><p>It’s a sign of his disregard for international law and belief in “fossil-fuel imperialism”, experts say.</p> <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/a

📚 Related People & Topics

Donald Trump

Donald Trump

President of the United States (2017–2021; since 2025)

Donald John Trump (born June 14, 1946) is an American politician, media personality, and businessman who is the 47th president of the United States. A member of the Republican Party, he served as the 45th president from 2017 to 2021. Born into a wealthy New York City family, Trump graduated from the...

View Profile → Wikipedia ↗

Entity Intersection Graph

Connections for Donald Trump:

🌐 Iran 7 shared
🌐 Hungary 4 shared
🏢 Board of Peace 4 shared
🌐 Potomac River 4 shared
🏢 Diplomacy 3 shared
View full profile

Mentioned Entities

Donald Trump

Donald Trump

President of the United States (2017–2021; since 2025)

Deep Analysis

Why It Matters

This news matters because it highlights how U.S. foreign policy under a potential Trump administration could prioritize fossil fuel interests, impacting global energy markets and geopolitical stability. It affects Iran's economy, global oil prices, and international relations, particularly with allies and adversaries in the Middle East. The emphasis on 'fossil-fuel imperialism' suggests a shift toward resource-driven diplomacy, which could undermine climate goals and escalate tensions in oil-rich regions.

Context & Background

  • The U.S. has historically imposed sanctions on Iran's oil exports, notably after withdrawing from the 2015 Iran nuclear deal (JCPOA) in 2018 under Trump.
  • Iran holds the world's fourth-largest oil reserves, making its production a key factor in global supply and OPEC dynamics.
  • Past U.S. administrations have used oil sanctions as a tool to pressure Iran on nuclear and regional issues, affecting global energy security.

What Happens Next

If Trump returns to office, expect renewed efforts to restrict Iran's oil sales, potentially through stricter sanctions, which could tighten global oil supply and raise prices. This may lead to increased tensions with China and other buyers of Iranian oil, and could trigger retaliatory actions from Iran, such as regional provocations or accelerated nuclear activities. Monitoring OPEC+ responses and diplomatic shifts in 2025 will be crucial.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is 'fossil-fuel imperialism' in this context?

It refers to a foreign policy approach where a powerful country, like the U.S., uses its influence to control or access oil resources in other nations, such as Iran, for economic or strategic gain. This can involve sanctions, military threats, or diplomatic pressure to secure energy interests, often at the expense of local sovereignty and global climate efforts.

How could Trump's policies affect global oil prices?

Stricter sanctions on Iranian oil exports would reduce global supply, potentially driving up oil prices, especially if other producers like Saudi Arabia don't compensate. This could increase costs for consumers worldwide and create volatility in energy markets, impacting economies dependent on oil imports.

Why is Iran's oil significant to U.S. foreign policy?

Iran's oil is significant because controlling its exports allows the U.S. to exert economic pressure on Iran over issues like nuclear proliferation and regional influence. It also helps the U.S. maintain leverage in the Middle East and support allies like Israel and Saudi Arabia, while securing energy resources for global markets.

What are the risks of focusing on Iranian oil?

Risks include escalating conflicts in the Middle East, as Iran may retaliate through proxy groups or nuclear advancements, and straining relations with allies who oppose harsh sanctions. It could also undermine international cooperation on climate change by prioritizing fossil fuels over renewable energy transitions.

How might other countries respond to U.S. actions on Iranian oil?

Countries like China and India, major buyers of Iranian oil, might resist U.S. sanctions by continuing purchases, leading to diplomatic friction. OPEC members could adjust production to stabilize markets, while European allies may push for diplomatic solutions to avoid supply disruptions.

}
Original Source
Analysis ‘Fossil-fuel imperialism’: Trump’s hankering for Iranian oil runs deep Dharna Noor Experts say the US believes it is entitled to resources it desires – a perspective president has supported for decades Donald Trump said this past weekend he wants to “take the oil in Iran” by seizing control of a key export hub, echoing a refrain he has returned to for over a decade. It’s a sign of his disregard for international law and belief in “fossil-fuel imperialism”, experts say. “Trump truly believes that the US is entitled to whatever resource it so desires,” said Patrick Bigger, co-director of the Transition Security Project, a research initiative focused on the climate and geopolitical concerns of militarization. “It’s a real ‘might-makes-right’ logic that is both abhorrent and spectacularly miscalculated.” Trump is due to provide an update on the Iran war on Wednesday. On Tuesday, he said the conflict could end within weeks, leading the stock market to soar in anticipation of the de-escalation. But Iran has said it would need guarantees against future attacks to halt its counteroffensive. And for now the war is continuing. Iran attacked a fully loaded crude oil tanker anchored at Dubai port on Monday. And earlier on Monday, the president said that if the strategically crucial strait of Hormuz were not “immediately” reopened and a peace deal not reached “shortly”, the US planned on “blowing up and completely obliterating” Iran’s energy infrastructure. (Iran has effectively blocked the Strait of Hormuz to most commercial traffic following the outbreak of war in late February.) That includes Kharg Island – the five-mile strip through which 90% of Iran’s oil is exported – as well as its electric generating plants and oilwells. The previous day, Trump told the Financial Times that he wanted US forces to take over Kharg Island and the oil it houses. “To be honest with you, my favorite thing is to take the oil in Iran,” he said, “but some stupid people back in the US sa...
Read full article at source

Source

theguardian.com

More from United Kingdom

News from Other Countries

🇺🇸 USA

🇺🇦 Ukraine