SP
BravenNow
North Dakota judge finalizes $345m judgment against Greenpeace in pipeline case
| United Kingdom | world | ✓ Verified - theguardian.com

North Dakota judge finalizes $345m judgment against Greenpeace in pipeline case

📌 Key Takeaways

  • {"type":"skipped","reason":"older_than_6_hours"}

📖 Full Retelling

<p>Judge slashed a $667m damages award to Energy Transfer over Greenpeace’s role in Dakota Access Pipeline protests</p><p>A North Dakota judge on Friday finalized a $345m judgment against Greenpeace in a lawsuit pursued by pipeline company Energy Transfer <a href="https://www.reuters.com/markets/companies/ET.N">(ET.N)</a> over the environmental group’s role in protests against the construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline.</p><p>The <a href="https://

📚 Related People & Topics

North Dakota

North Dakota

U.S. state

North Dakota ( də-KOH-tə) is a landlocked U.S. state in the Upper Midwest, named after the indigenous Dakota and Sioux peoples. It is bordered by the Canadian provinces of Saskatchewan and Manitoba to the north and by the U.S. states of Minnesota to the east, South Dakota to the south, and Montana...

View Profile → Wikipedia ↗

Entity Intersection Graph

Connections for North Dakota:

👤 Summit League 4 shared
🌐 Uelmen 2 shared
🌐 Tournament 1 shared
🌐 Basketball 1 shared
👤 The Summit League Tournament 1 shared
View full profile

Mentioned Entities

North Dakota

North Dakota

U.S. state

}
Original Source
North Dakota judge finalizes $345m judgment against Greenpeace in pipeline case Judge slashed a $667m damages award to Energy Transfer over Greenpeace’s role in Dakota Access Pipeline protests A North Dakota judge on Friday finalized a $345m judgment against Greenpeace in a lawsuit pursued by pipeline company Energy Transfer (ET.N) over the environmental group’s role in protests against the construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline. The final judgment by judge James Gion was in line with a decision he issued in October, in which he slashed by almost half a damages award of about $667m that a jury had awarded Energy Transfer in March. Greenpeace in a statement said it would seek a new trial and, if necessary, appeal the decision to the North Dakota supreme court, calling the lawsuit “a blatant attempt to silence free speech”. “Speaking out against corporations that cause environmental harm should never be deemed unlawful,” Marco Simons, interim general counsel at Greenpeace USA and Greenpeace Fund, said in a statement. Energy Transfer in a statement called the decision an “important step in this legal process of holding Greenpeace accountable for its unlawful and damaging actions against us during the construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline”. It added it was “analyzing possible next steps that we may choose to take to make sure they are held fully accountable”. The Dakota Access project near the Standing Rock Indian Reservation began in 2016 and was completed in 2017. Construction of the pipeline, which now transports roughly 40% of the oil produced in North Dakota’s Bakken region, was met with fierce protests by environmental and tribal advocacy groups who said it would poison the local water supply and exacerbate the climate crisis. Texas-based Energy Transfer first sued Greenpeace in a federal court in North Dakota in 2017, accusing it of spreading falsehoods about the project and paying protesters to disrupt construction. The North Dakota jury delivered its v...
Read full article at source

Source

theguardian.com

More from United Kingdom

News from Other Countries

🇺🇸 USA

🇺🇦 Ukraine