SP
BravenNow
The hill I will die on: Streaming is rubbish – take me back to the golden era of DVDs | Frances Ryan
| United Kingdom | politics | ✓ Verified - theguardian.com

The hill I will die on: Streaming is rubbish – take me back to the golden era of DVDs | Frances Ryan

#streaming #DVDs #media ownership #content removal #nostalgia #entertainment #physical media #Frances Ryan

📌 Key Takeaways

  • The author argues that streaming services are inferior to DVDs, citing issues like content removal and lack of ownership.
  • DVDs offered a more permanent and reliable way to access films and TV shows without reliance on internet or licensing changes.
  • Streaming platforms are criticized for their unpredictable libraries and the potential loss of access to purchased content.
  • The piece nostalgically recalls the tangible benefits of DVDs, such as special features and physical collections.
  • It calls for a return to the perceived golden era of DVDs as a solution to modern streaming frustrations.

📖 Full Retelling

<p>Deliver me from the hassle of multiple platforms, ‘double paywalls’ and the nagging feeling I’m helping to fund Jeff Bezos’s next yacht</p><p>Streaming has many strengths: producing some of the best shows of recent years, convenience, the chance to spend hours of your life scrolling through algorithm-suggested content only to watch nothing and then pass out at 1am. But when it comes to watching films on the platforms, I am one extortionate paywall away from buying a DVD play

🏷️ Themes

Media Criticism, Nostalgia

📚 Related People & Topics

Frances Ryan

British journalist and author (born 1985)

Frances Ryan FRSL is a British journalist, author, and activist for people with disabilities. In 2021 the Shaw Trust named her one of the UK's ten most influential disabilities activists. Global Citizen called her "a prominent voice for people with disabilities in the media".

View Profile → Wikipedia ↗

Entity Intersection Graph

No entity connections available yet for this article.

Mentioned Entities

Frances Ryan

British journalist and author (born 1985)

Deep Analysis

Why It Matters

This opinion piece matters because it critiques the dominant streaming model that has fundamentally reshaped media consumption for billions worldwide. It affects consumers who feel frustrated by content fragmentation across platforms, disappearing titles, and the loss of ownership. The article also impacts entertainment industry professionals and preservationists concerned about digital impermanence and corporate control over cultural artifacts.

Context & Background

  • The DVD era (late 1990s-2010s) represented peak physical media ownership, allowing consumers permanent access to purchased content
  • Streaming services have grown from Netflix's 2007 launch to a $100+ billion industry dominated by Netflix, Disney+, Amazon Prime, and others
  • The 'streaming wars' have led to content fragmentation where exclusive titles are scattered across competing platforms
  • Physical media sales have declined approximately 80% since 2008 as streaming became dominant
  • Archivists have raised concerns about 'digital decay' where streaming content can disappear without preservation

What Happens Next

We'll likely see continued debate about digital ownership rights, possible growth in niche physical media markets, and potential regulatory attention to streaming platform practices. Some services may experiment with 'permanent purchase' options for digital content. The 2024-2025 period may bring more industry consolidation as smaller streaming services struggle with profitability.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the main disadvantages of streaming compared to DVDs?

Streaming offers no permanent ownership—content can disappear when licenses expire or services shut down. It requires continuous subscriptions to multiple platforms to access fragmented content libraries, and quality depends on internet connectivity rather than consistent physical media standards.

Why do some people still prefer physical media?

Physical media provides guaranteed access without subscription fees, often includes special features and higher audio/video quality, and serves as a preservation method against digital removal. Collectors also value the tangible ownership and artwork missing from streaming interfaces.

Is the DVD market completely dead?

No, while mainstream retail has declined, niche markets continue for collectors, cinephiles, and regions with poor internet. Specialty labels like Criterion maintain robust physical media sales, and some filmmakers still prioritize physical releases for preservation.

Could streaming services address these criticisms?

Yes, platforms could offer permanent digital purchases, improve content preservation transparency, reduce fragmentation through licensing agreements, and provide better special features. Some services already experiment with download functions, though these typically include expiration limitations.

How has streaming changed film and television production?

Streaming has increased series production but decreased film preservation incentives, shifted revenue models from sales to subscriptions, and created 'content churn' where shows are quickly canceled or removed. It has also enabled global distribution but reduced standardized regional releases.

}
Original Source
The hill I will die on: Streaming is rubbish – take me back to the golden era of DVDs Frances Ryan Deliver me from the hassle of multiple platforms, ‘double paywalls’ and the nagging feeling I’m helping to fund Jeff Bezos’s next yacht S treaming has many strengths: producing some of the best shows of recent years, convenience, the chance to spend hours of your life scrolling through algorithm-suggested content only to watch nothing and then pass out at 1am. But when it comes to watching films on the platforms, I am one extortionate paywall away from buying a DVD player off eBay and Googling: “Does Blockbuster still exist?” It is not simply that Netflix and co are killing cinema – although, yes, that is a thing that is objectively bad . It is that the advent of streaming has made watching a movie in your own home more costly, more restricted and often incredibly annoying. As a millennial, I like to think I grew up in the golden era of film. You could go to the cinema for a fiver to watch a movie that wasn’t three hours long . And really brilliantly, you could take a trip to your local DVD shop to rent something or buy a physical copy that was yours for ever (at least until the format became outdated and you sold it in a bundle for £1 on Facebook Marketplace). Nowadays, if you rent a film that has recently been released it’ll cost you up to £20, far more than if you saw it in most cinemas – plus you’re paying the electric and heating bills. If you want to see last night’s Oscar contenders as part of your standard streaming packages before 2027, you will probably need to subscribe to every major platform as well as to satellite. And if you feel like watching an old classic, make sure you set aside plenty of time to find it. When I fancied rewatching Sense and Sensibility recently, it struck me how it had become the norm to have to search through Netflix , Prime and Disney+ to work out which one currently owns the rights to each film. I eventually unearthed it on iPlaye...
Read full article at source

Source

theguardian.com

More from United Kingdom

News from Other Countries

🇺🇸 USA

🇺🇦 Ukraine