Точка Синхронізації

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled on Monday that the Trump administration may proceed with plans to terminate Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for approximately 60,000 migrants from Nepal, Honduras, and Nicaragua. This judicial decision, delivered in San Francisco, reverses a previous lower court injunction that had prevented the government from ending these humanitarian protections. The appellate panel determined that federal law grants the executive branch broad authority to manage immigration status, particularly when the conditions in a migrant's home country no longer justify an emergency stay in the United States. In its deliberations, the three-judge panel specifically cited recent precedents established by the U.S. Supreme Court, which have consistently restricted the ability of lower courts to review certain discretionary decisions made by the Department of Homeland Security. By aligning with these high court rulings, the Ninth Circuit effectively dismissed long-standing legal challenges brought by immigrant rights advocates. These advocates had argued that the administration's push to end TPS was motivated by political bias rather than objective assessments of safety in the affected nations. The expiration of these protections leaves tens of thousands of individuals in a state of legal limbo, as many have resided and worked legally in the United States for decades. For migrants from Honduras and Nicaragua, TPS was originally granted following the devastation of Hurricane Mitch in 1998, while Nepalese citizens received the status following a catastrophic earthquake in 2015. The court's move signals a significant shift in the legal landscape, prioritizing executive discretion over the humanitarian concerns traditionally associated with the TPS program. Legal experts suggest that this ruling could set the stage for further terminations of protected status for other nationalities as the government seeks to tighten immigration controls. While an immediate mass deportation is unlikely due to potential further appeals or administrative processes, the decision removes the primary legal barrier that has protected these groups since the policy was first challenged during the Trump presidency. Activists have expressed deep concern, stating that returning to countries still struggling with economic instability and violence could lead to severe human rights consequences.