SP
BravenNow
'Born in the U.S.A.': Bruce Springsteen and ACLU take birthright citizenship to the Supreme Court
| USA | politics | ✓ Verified - washingtontimes.com

'Born in the U.S.A.': Bruce Springsteen and ACLU take birthright citizenship to the Supreme Court

📖 Full Retelling

Bruce Springsteen has teamed up with the American Civil Liberties Union to create a video pairing his 1984 hit song "Born in the U.S.A." with the faces of Americans who could lose their birthright citizenship under a Trump administration executive order.

📚 Related People & Topics

Supreme court

Supreme court

Highest court in a jurisdiction

In most legal jurisdictions, a supreme court, also known as a court of last resort, apex court, high (or final) court of appeal, and court of final appeal, is the highest court within the hierarchy of courts. Broadly speaking, the decisions of a supreme court are binding on all other courts in a nat...

View Profile → Wikipedia ↗
Bruce Springsteen

Bruce Springsteen

American rock musician (born 1949)

Bruce Frederick Joseph Springsteen (born September 23, 1949) is an American singer, songwriter, and guitarist. Nicknamed "the Boss", Springsteen has released 21 studio albums spanning six decades; most of his albums feature the E Street Band, his backing band since 1972. Springsteen is a pioneer of ...

View Profile → Wikipedia ↗

Entity Intersection Graph

Connections for Supreme court:

🌐 Tariffs in the Trump administration 25 shared
👤 Donald Trump 19 shared
🌐 Tariff 16 shared
🌐 Commercial policy 12 shared
🌐 International Emergency Economic Powers Act 9 shared
View full profile

Mentioned Entities

Supreme court

Supreme court

Highest court in a jurisdiction

Bruce Springsteen

Bruce Springsteen

American rock musician (born 1949)

Deep Analysis

Why It Matters

This case challenges the 14th Amendment's birthright citizenship principle, which has been settled law for over 150 years. The outcome could affect millions of children born to undocumented immigrants in the U.S., potentially creating a class of stateless individuals. It also has significant implications for immigration policy, constitutional interpretation, and could trigger broader debates about citizenship criteria. The involvement of high-profile figures like Bruce Springsteen amplifies public attention on this fundamental constitutional question.

Context & Background

  • The 14th Amendment's Citizenship Clause (Section 1) was ratified in 1868, stating 'All persons born or naturalized in the United States... are citizens of the United States.'
  • Birthright citizenship was established in the 1898 Supreme Court case United States v. Wong Kim Ark, which affirmed citizenship for children born to non-citizen parents legally residing in the U.S.
  • Previous challenges to birthright citizenship have been rejected by courts, but recent political movements have sought to reinterpret 'subject to the jurisdiction thereof' to exclude children of undocumented immigrants.
  • The U.S. is one of approximately 30 countries that practice unconditional birthright citizenship, alongside Canada and Mexico, while most European and Asian nations have more restrictive policies.

What Happens Next

The Supreme Court will likely decide whether to hear the case in their upcoming term. If accepted, oral arguments would occur in late 2024 or early 2025, with a decision expected by June 2025. Regardless of the Court's decision, the case will likely spur legislative proposals in Congress to either codify or restrict birthright citizenship. State-level initiatives may also emerge attempting to challenge or circumvent the ruling.

Frequently Asked Questions

What exactly is being challenged in this Supreme Court case?

The case challenges whether children born in the U.S. to undocumented immigrants automatically qualify for citizenship under the 14th Amendment. Plaintiffs argue the phrase 'subject to the jurisdiction thereof' excludes those whose parents entered the country illegally.

Why is Bruce Springsteen involved in this case?

Springsteen is participating as a cultural figure whose song 'Born in the U.S.A.' has become symbolic of birthright citizenship. His involvement brings celebrity attention to the ACLU's defense of constitutional principles.

How would overturning birthright citizenship affect current citizens?

Overturning birthright citizenship would not affect those already granted citizenship, but could create uncertainty about their status if challenged. It would primarily affect future children born to undocumented parents, potentially leaving them without citizenship in any country.

What are the main arguments against changing birthright citizenship?

Opponents argue it would violate the 14th Amendment's clear language, create administrative chaos in determining citizenship, and potentially produce a permanent underclass of stateless children. They also contend it would undermine America's historical identity as a nation of immigrants.

Which other countries have similar birthright citizenship policies?

Canada, Mexico, Brazil, Argentina, and most Caribbean nations have birthright citizenship. The United Kingdom abolished unconditional birthright citizenship in 1983, while Australia did so in 1986, requiring at least one parent to be a citizen or permanent resident.

}
Original Source
1 Subscribe Close Sign in Sign in Subscribe Newsletter signup Gift subscriptions Customer service Sign Out My Account Manage newsletters Gift subscriptions Today's E-Edition Customer service Search Search Keyword: Search News Corrections Politics National World Security The Advocates Seen, Heard & Whispered Business & Economy D.C. Local Media Spotlight Newsmakers Waste, Fraud & Abuse Inside the Ring Higher Ground Culture Entertainment Technology Obituaries Just the Headlines Dive Deeper Celebrating The Washington Times Policy Corrections Threat Status Energy & Environment Banking & Finance Health Care Reform Second Amendment Immigration Reform Homeland & Cybersecurity Aerospace & Defense Taxes & Budget Law Enforcement & Intelligence Transportation & Infrastructure Commentary Commentary Main Corrections Editorials Letters Cheryl K. Chumley Kelly Sadler Jed Babbin Tom Basile Tim Constantine Joseph Curl Joseph R. DeTrani Don Feder Billy Hallowell Daniel N. Hoffman David Keene Robert Knight Gene Marks Clifford D. May Michael McKenna Stephen Moore Tim Murtaugh Peter Navarro Everett Piper Cal Thomas Scott Walker Miles Yu Black Voices Books Cartoons To the Republic Sports Sports Main Corrections Washington Commanders Football Baseball Basketball NCAA Thom Loverro Tennis Golf Hockey Soccer Horse Racing NASCAR & Racing District of Sports Podcast Sports Photos Sponsored Corrections Building the health care Americans deserve Revitalizing Rural America Unbridled Clean Energy Faith at Work Building a healthier America Transportation 2025 Investing in American Health Renewing American Energy Dominance Infrastructure 2025 Free Iran 2025 Invest in Greece 2025 Events Corrections Subscriber Only Events Reagan Forum IDEX 2025 Reinventing after Globalization Harm Reduction and Public Health Golden Dome for America Videos Things to do in D.C. Video/Podcasts Corrections All Videos All Podcasts The Front Page Threat Status Politically Unstable The Sitdown with Alex Swoyer Bold & Blunt The...
Read full article at source

Source

washingtontimes.com

More from USA

News from Other Countries

🇬🇧 United Kingdom

🇺🇦 Ukraine