SP
BravenNow
Brutally Honest Oscar Ballot  #1: ‘Sentimental Value’ “Nearly Perfect,” “Didn’t Want [‘Hamnet’s] Jessie Buckley Turned Up to a 10 the Entire Time”
| USA | culture | ✓ Verified - hollywoodreporter.com

Brutally Honest Oscar Ballot #1: ‘Sentimental Value’ “Nearly Perfect,” “Didn’t Want [‘Hamnet’s] Jessie Buckley Turned Up to a 10 the Entire Time”

#Oscar voting #Academy Awards #Documentary branch #Film criticism #Anonymous source #Award season #Hollywood Reporter

📌 Key Takeaways

  • Anonymous Academy member provides unfiltered Oscar voting opinions
  • 'Sentimental Value' ranked as top choice across multiple categories
  • Voter admitted to not seeing all nominated films yet still voted
  • Personal preferences outweighed critical acclaim in several categories

📖 Full Retelling

A female member of the Academy's 719-person documentary branch, granted anonymity in exchange for candor, shared her Oscar ballot preferences with The Hollywood Reporter, offering brutally honest assessments of this year's nominees across all categories without any professional connections to the films or filmmakers. The anonymous voter detailed her ranking process, explaining that she placed 'Frankenstein' at number ten in Best Picture not because she disliked it but because she hadn't actually seen it, admitting to checking the box anyway to support other films. Her candid critique extended to highly praised nominees like 'Hamnet,' which she found 'overwrought' and criticized for keeping Jessie Buckley 'turned up to 10 the entire time,' while ultimately crowning 'Sentimental Value' as her top choice for its 'exquisite, nearly perfect' qualities. The voter's unconventional approach included ranking 'Sinners' and 'One Battle After Another' highly despite acknowledging flaws, and selecting Ethan Hawke as Best Actor for 'Blue Moon' over more celebrated performances, demonstrating how personal taste and unique criteria influence Oscar voting beyond critical consensus.

🏷️ Themes

Oscar voting transparency, Film criticism subjectivity, Academy Awards politics

📚 Related People & Topics

Film criticism

Film criticism

Analysis and evaluation of films

Film criticism is the analysis and evaluation of films and the film medium. In general, film criticism can be divided into two categories: Academic criticism by film scholars, who study the composition of film theory and publish their findings and essays in books and journals, and general journalist...

View Profile → Wikipedia ↗

Source (journalism)

Person, publication, or document that gives timely information

In journalism, a source is a person, publication, or knowledge of other record or document that gives timely information. Outside journalism, sources are sometimes known as "news sources". Examples of sources include official records, publications or broadcasts, officials in government or business, ...

View Profile → Wikipedia ↗

Academy Awards

Annual awards for cinematic achievements

The Academy Awards, commonly known as the Oscars, are awards for artistic and technical merit in film. They are presented annually by the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences (AMPAS) in the United States in recognition of excellence in cinematic achievements, as assessed by the Academy's voti...

View Profile → Wikipedia ↗

Entity Intersection Graph

Connections for Film criticism:

🌐 Cinema 1 shared
👤 The New York Times 1 shared
🌐 Deadline 1 shared
🌐 Strangers (disambiguation) 1 shared
🌐 Origin story 1 shared
View full profile

Mentioned Entities

Film criticism

Film criticism

Analysis and evaluation of films

Source (journalism)

Person, publication, or document that gives timely information

Academy Awards

Annual awards for cinematic achievements

}
Original Source
Share on Facebook Share on X Google Preferred Share to Flipboard Show additional share options Share on LinkedIn Share on Pinterest Share on Reddit Share on Tumblr Share on Whats App Send an Email Print the Article Post a Comment A female member of the Academy’s 719-person documentary branch who has no connection to any of this year’s nominees, granted a cloak of anonymity in return for candor, speaks with THR about her ballot. Best picture I put Frankenstein at number 10 because I haven’t seen it, which is unfair, but I ran out of time and decided to check the box indicating that I had so that I could support other films. F1 was not for me — I watched about 45 minutes of it, and I didn’t need to watch more. I’m a huge fan of Yorgos Lanthimos, but Bugonia , while I admired its ambition and performances, did not work for me. I liked Train Dreams and thought it was visually beautiful, but I grew a little tired of the character’s point of view and didn’t find it especially unique. Marty Supreme was a great ride, but it ultimately felt like more of the same stuff we’ve seen from the Safdies, even if this one was just Josh. I admired The Secret Agent ’s performances and design, but was not as captivated by the narrative as I wanted to be. Hamnet was emotional and beautifully rendered, but a bit overwrought — I didn’t want Jessie turned up to a 10 the entire time. To me, One Battle After Another , Sinners and Sentimental Value are all best picture-worthy. I loved One Battle , but there were flaws — I heard from a lot of friends in the Black community that they were troubled by the character Perfidia Beverly Hills, and I really hear that. With Sinners , I was leaning forward in my seat with my mouth open for the entire movie — it was so ambitious, profound, provocative and entertaining. But at the end of the day, I put Sentimental Value on top because it was, to me, exquisite, nearly perfect, and my kind of movie. Related Stories Movies Maggie Gyllenhaal Loved Those 'The B...
Read full article at source

Source

hollywoodreporter.com

More from USA

News from Other Countries

🇬🇧 United Kingdom

🇺🇦 Ukraine