SP
BravenNow
DyJR: Preserving Diversity in Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards via Dynamic Jensen-Shannon Replay
| USA | technology | βœ“ Verified - arxiv.org

DyJR: Preserving Diversity in Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards via Dynamic Jensen-Shannon Replay

#DyJR #reinforcement learning #diversity preservation #verifiable rewards #Jensen-Shannon Replay #adaptive sampling #machine learning

πŸ“Œ Key Takeaways

  • DyJR introduces a method to maintain diversity in reinforcement learning agents.
  • It uses verifiable rewards to ensure reliable learning outcomes.
  • The approach employs Dynamic Jensen-Shannon Replay for adaptive data sampling.
  • This technique aims to prevent performance degradation from lack of diversity.
  • It addresses challenges in complex environments requiring varied strategies.

πŸ“– Full Retelling

arXiv:2603.16157v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: While Reinforcement Learning (RL) enhances Large Language Model reasoning, on-policy algorithms like GRPO are sample-inefficient as they discard past rollouts. Existing experience replay methods address this by reusing accurate samples for direct policy updates, but this often incurs high computational costs and causes mode collapse via overfitting. We argue that historical data should prioritize sustaining diversity rather than simply reinforci

🏷️ Themes

Reinforcement Learning, Algorithm Diversity

πŸ“š Related People & Topics

Reinforcement learning

Reinforcement learning

Field of machine learning

In machine learning and optimal control, reinforcement learning (RL) is concerned with how an intelligent agent should take actions in a dynamic environment in order to maximize a reward signal. Reinforcement learning is one of the three basic machine learning paradigms, alongside supervised learnin...

View Profile β†’ Wikipedia β†—

Entity Intersection Graph

Connections for Reinforcement learning:

🌐 Large language model 10 shared
🌐 Artificial intelligence 8 shared
🌐 Machine learning 4 shared
🌐 AI agent 3 shared
🏒 Science Publishing Group 2 shared
View full profile

Mentioned Entities

Reinforcement learning

Reinforcement learning

Field of machine learning

Deep Analysis

Why It Matters

This research matters because it addresses a fundamental challenge in reinforcement learning where agents often converge to suboptimal solutions by losing behavioral diversity during training. It affects AI researchers, developers working on complex decision-making systems, and organizations deploying RL in real-world applications like robotics, autonomous systems, and game AI. The verifiable reward aspect provides more trustworthy AI systems, while preserving diversity leads to more robust and adaptable agents that can handle unexpected situations better.

Context & Background

  • Reinforcement learning agents often suffer from 'mode collapse' where they converge prematurely to limited behavioral strategies
  • Traditional replay buffers in RL typically prioritize high-reward experiences, potentially reducing policy diversity over time
  • Jensen-Shannon divergence is a statistical measure used to quantify differences between probability distributions, previously applied in machine learning for tasks like GAN training
  • Maintaining diverse behaviors is crucial for RL agents to explore different strategies and avoid getting stuck in local optima
  • Verifiable rewards represent an emerging research direction aiming to make AI decision-making more transparent and accountable

What Happens Next

Researchers will likely implement and test DyJR across various RL benchmarks and real-world applications to validate its effectiveness. The method may be integrated into popular RL frameworks like Stable Baselines3 or Ray RLlib within 6-12 months. Future work will explore combining DyJR with other diversity-preservation techniques and applying it to multi-agent systems. Conference presentations at NeurIPS, ICML, or ICLR are probable within the next year.

Frequently Asked Questions

What problem does DyJR specifically solve in reinforcement learning?

DyJR addresses the loss of behavioral diversity during RL training by dynamically managing experience replay using Jensen-Shannon divergence. This prevents agents from converging too quickly to limited strategies and helps maintain exploration of different approaches to problem-solving.

How does the 'verifiable rewards' component work?

The verifiable rewards likely involve mechanisms to ensure reward signals are transparent, interpretable, and aligned with intended objectives. This could include reward shaping techniques, reward validation procedures, or methods to detect reward hacking where agents exploit loopholes in reward functions.

What are practical applications of this research?

This research could improve RL applications in robotics where diverse strategies help handle unexpected situations, in game AI for more varied and interesting opponent behaviors, and in autonomous systems where robustness to edge cases is critical. The verifiable rewards aspect is particularly valuable for safety-critical applications.

How does DyJR compare to existing diversity-preservation methods?

Unlike simple entropy regularization or population-based methods, DyJR uses dynamic Jensen-Shannon divergence to actively measure and maintain diversity in the replay buffer itself. This provides more fine-grained control over behavioral diversity throughout training rather than just encouraging exploration.

What are the computational requirements of this approach?

Calculating Jensen-Shannon divergence adds computational overhead compared to standard replay buffers, but the dynamic aspect likely optimizes when diversity measurements are needed. The method probably requires additional memory to track behavioral distributions but should scale similarly to other advanced replay techniques.

}
Original Source
arXiv:2603.16157v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: While Reinforcement Learning (RL) enhances Large Language Model reasoning, on-policy algorithms like GRPO are sample-inefficient as they discard past rollouts. Existing experience replay methods address this by reusing accurate samples for direct policy updates, but this often incurs high computational costs and causes mode collapse via overfitting. We argue that historical data should prioritize sustaining diversity rather than simply reinforci
Read full article at source

Source

arxiv.org

More from USA

News from Other Countries

πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ United Kingdom

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ Ukraine