Точка Синхронізації

AI Archive of Human History

ICE has escalated to illegal home invasions. This will end poorly
| USA | general

ICE has escalated to illegal home invasions. This will end poorly

#ICE #Fourth Amendment #Judicial Warrant #Home Raids #Homeland Security #Administrative Warrant #Civil Rights

📌 Key Takeaways

  • ICE is allegedly violating the Fourth Amendment by using administrative warrants for forcible home entries.
  • A leaked 2025 memo reveals agents are being trained to bypass the requirement for a judge-signed judicial warrant.
  • Wrongful raids have targeted U.S. citizens, highlighting the risks of removing independent judicial oversight.
  • Advocates warn this policy may grant other federal agencies the precedent to enter homes without court authorization.

📖 Full Retelling

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents have significantly escalated enforcement tactics by conducting forcible home invasions without judicial warrants across states including Minnesota, California, and Texas as of early 2026. This shift in operations follows a leaked May 2025 internal memo that instructs agents to use administrative warrants—documents signed by executive branch staff rather than judges—to enter private residences, a move intended to streamline arrests of undocumented individuals. The policy change gained national attention after high-profile incidents such as the wrongful detainment of Scott Thao, a naturalized U.S. citizen in St. Paul who was dragged from his home in subfreezing temperatures despite having no criminal record. Legal experts and civil rights advocates argue that these actions directly violate the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which protects individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures. Historically, the Supreme Court has maintained a clear distinction between judicial warrants, which require a neutral magistrate's oversight and probable cause, and administrative warrants, which were previously understood to lack the authority for nonconsensual home entry. The new ICE directive contradicts the agency's own 2023 operations handbook and a 2025 Homeland Security training manual, both of which explicitly stated that administrative warrants are insufficient grounds for entering a home. The implementation of this policy has been characterized by extreme secrecy, with whistleblowers revealing that agents are being trained verbally to avoid a paper trail. Critics warn that this unilateral expansion of government power sets a dangerous precedent that could eventually be adopted by other federal agencies, such as the IRS or the ATF, to bypass judicial oversight. As public trust in immigration enforcement declines, Democratic lawmakers are facing pressure to condition future Homeland Security funding on the termination of these controversial home raid practices to protect the sanctity of private residences.

🏷️ Themes

Civil Liberties, Government Overreach, Immigration Policy

📚 Related People & Topics

Fourth Amendment

Topics referred to by the same term

Fourth Amendment may refer to:

Wikipedia →

Homeland security

United States notion of safety from terrorism

In American national security policy, homeland security is "the national effort to ensure a homeland that is safe, secure, and resilient against terrorism and other hazards where American interests, aspirations, and ways of life can thrive" to the "national effort to prevent terrorist attacks within...

Wikipedia →

United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement

United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement

US federal law enforcement agency

# United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) **United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)** is a federal law enforcement agency operating under the jurisdiction of the **U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS)**. It serves as the primary investigative and enforcement ar...

Wikipedia →

📄 Original Source Content
By Raul A. Reyes Guest contributor Feb. 9, 2026 3:03 AM PT 6 min Click here to listen to this article Share via Close extra sharing options Email Facebook X LinkedIn Threads Reddit WhatsApp Copy Link URL Copied! Print 0:00 0:00 1x This is read by an automated voice. Please report any issues or inconsistencies here . p]:text-cms-story-body-color-text clearfix max-w-170 mt-7.5 mb-10 mx-auto" data-subscriber-content Scott) Thao, 56, was taking a Sunday afternoon nap recently at his home in St. Paul, Minn., when federal immigration agents broke down his front door. A group of masked, armed men burst in and took him outdoors in subfreezing temperatures wearing only Crocs, his underwear and a blanket. After being questioned by agents for nearly an hour, he was returned to his residence without any explanation or apology. Thao is a naturalized U.S. citizen with no criminal record. While searches like these used to require a judicial warrant, a recently leaked Immigration and Customs Enforcement memo from May instructs agents to forcibly enter homes with only an administrative warrant. This policy flies in the face of the Constitution, legal precedent and Homeland Security’s own guidelines. It should concern all Americans who value their privacy and civil liberties. The warrants that most of us think of — the “come back with a warrant” kind familiar from legal dramas — is a judicial warrant, different from administrative . Advertisement Judicial warrants are issued by judges when they are presented with probable cause and allow law enforcement officers to enter and search a person’s residence. In contrast, administrative warrants are issued by staff in the executive branch and can be used to arrest someone, including someone suspected of being in the U.S. without legal status. But until May, they were understood to not allow law enforcement officers to enter a suspect’s home. ICE is now blurring the distinction between these two types of warrants, telling agents to barge in...

Original source

More from USA

News from Other Countries

🇵🇱 Poland

🇬🇧 United Kingdom

🇺🇦 Ukraine

🇮🇳 India