SP
BravenNow
Pentagon Weighs Using Anti-Drone Lasers Near D.C. Military Base
| USA | general | ✓ Verified - nytimes.com

Pentagon Weighs Using Anti-Drone Lasers Near D.C. Military Base

📖 Full Retelling

Sightings of drones around Fort McNair, the Army base where Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Secretary of State Marco Rubio live, have prompted consideration of deploying the new technology.

📚 Related People & Topics

Military base

Military base

Facility directly owned and operated by or for the military

A military base is a facility directly owned and operated by or for the military or one of its branches that shelters military equipment and personnel, and facilitates training and operations. A military base always provides accommodations for one or more units, but it may also be used as a command ...

View Profile → Wikipedia ↗
Pentagon

Pentagon

Shape with five sides

In geometry, a pentagon (from Greek πέντε (pente) 'five' and γωνία (gonia) 'angle') is any five-sided polygon or 5-gon. The sum of the internal angles in a simple pentagon is 540°. A pentagon may be simple or self-intersecting.

View Profile → Wikipedia ↗

Entity Intersection Graph

Connections for Military base:

🌐 List of wars involving Iran 2 shared
👤 Donald Trump 2 shared
👤 Mojtaba Khamenei 1 shared
🌐 List of modern conflicts in the Middle East 1 shared
🌐 Strait of Hormuz 1 shared
View full profile

Mentioned Entities

Military base

Military base

Facility directly owned and operated by or for the military

Pentagon

Pentagon

Shape with five sides

Deep Analysis

Why It Matters

This development matters because it represents a significant escalation in domestic military security measures, potentially normalizing advanced weaponry deployment within U.S. civilian airspace. It directly affects residents near Joint Base Anacostia-Bolling and the broader Washington D.C. area, raising questions about safety protocols and electromagnetic radiation exposure. The decision could set precedents for how military bases nationwide address increasing drone threats, balancing security needs with public safety concerns.

Context & Background

  • The Pentagon has been developing directed-energy weapons like lasers for over two decades, with recent systems achieving operational status in Middle East deployments.
  • Washington D.C. has been designated as Special Flight Rules Area (SFRA) since 9/11, with strict airspace restrictions around government buildings and military installations.
  • Military bases nationwide have reported increasing drone incursions, with 1,700 documented cases in 2022 alone, prompting enhanced counter-drone measures.
  • Previous anti-drone measures around D.C. have included signal jammers and net-carrying drones, but lasers represent a more technologically advanced solution.
  • The 2023 National Defense Authorization Act allocated $668 million for directed-energy weapons development and deployment across military branches.

What Happens Next

The Pentagon will likely complete its environmental and safety assessment within 3-6 months, followed by potential testing phases at remote facilities before any D.C. deployment. Congressional armed services committees will probably hold hearings on the proposal in the next quarter, examining both security benefits and potential risks. If approved, initial systems could be operational near Joint Base Anacostia-Bolling by late 2024, with possible expansion to other D.C.-area military installations in 2025.

Frequently Asked Questions

How do anti-drone lasers actually work?

These directed-energy systems typically use high-powered lasers to heat drone components until they malfunction or combust. They can disable drones at ranges up to several kilometers by precisely targeting critical systems like batteries or flight controllers, with engagement times measured in seconds.

Are these lasers dangerous to people or aircraft?

Military-grade anti-drone lasers are designed with multiple safety features including automatic cutoff systems and restricted firing arcs. However, concerns remain about potential eye damage from scattered radiation and the risk of falling debris from disabled drones.

Why is Washington D.C. specifically considering this technology?

D.C. hosts the highest concentration of government and military targets in the U.S., making it particularly vulnerable to drone-based threats. The area's existing flight restrictions create a controlled environment where laser systems could operate with fewer civilian aviation conflicts compared to other locations.

What legal authority allows military lasers in civilian areas?

The Department of Defense can deploy defensive systems under existing authorities protecting military installations, supplemented by FAA regulations governing airspace security. However, new congressional approvals or presidential directives might be required for permanent domestic deployment.

Have similar systems been used elsewhere successfully?

Yes, the U.S. military has deployed laser-based counter-drone systems in conflict zones like Iraq and Syria since 2020. The Navy has also tested ship-based laser weapons, while allied nations including Israel and the UK have developed their own operational anti-drone laser systems.

}
Original Source
Advertisement SKIP ADVERTISEMENT Supported by SKIP ADVERTISEMENT Pentagon Weighs Using Anti-Drone Lasers in Washington Airspace Sightings of drones around Fort McNair, the Army base where Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Secretary of State Marco Rubio live, have prompted consideration of deploying the new technology. Listen · 8:37 min Share full article 0 By Kate Kelly Eric Schmitt and Tyler Pager Reporting from Washington March 31, 2026, 11:11 a.m. ET The Pentagon is considering sending a powerful anti-drone laser system to the military base in Washington where Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Secretary of State Marco Rubio reside, according to four people who have been briefed on the matter. While the plans are still in flux, the Army is weighing using the technology near Mr. Hegseth’s and Mr. Rubio’s residences at Fort Lesley J. McNair, in Southwest Washington, according to those people, who requested anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly. The Army has been debating deploying the lasers there after reports of unusual drone activity in the airspace around Fort McNair. The drone sightings have prompted concerns about possible surveillance of two high-ranking national security officials at a time when the United States is at war with Iran. But placing the lasers near Fort McNair would add a layer of complexity to the heavily traveled airspace over Washington. The laser system has been the subject of a heated dispute between the Federal Aviation Administration, which has raised safety concerns about its use along the border with Mexico, and the Pentagon, which has been more eager to deploy it to fight drone incursions by Mexican drug cartels. The F.A.A. is already under intense scrutiny after a midair collision between an Army helicopter and a regional passenger jet killed 67 people over the Potomac River near Ronald Reagan National Airport last year. National Airport, located across the Potomac in Northern Virginia, is about two miles from...
Read full article at source

Source

nytimes.com

More from USA

News from Other Countries

🇬🇧 United Kingdom

🇺🇦 Ukraine