Prediction market 'gambling' needs state regulation, not feds, Mick Mulvaney says after Iran war bets
📖 Full Retelling
Mick Mulvaney also said prediction markets, by offering contracts on events such as wars, could represent a security risk for the U.S.
Entity Intersection Graph
No entity connections available yet for this article.
Original Source
Buying contracts on prediction markets is just another word for "gambling," says former Trump White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney , who is leading a coalition that wants state authorities, not a federal commodities agency, to regulate that growing industry. "The simple answer is that it's gambling. It just is," Mulvaney told CNBC's Contessa Brewer , saying the burgeoning industry needs extra scrutiny following betting activity ahead of the Iran war. "I buy a prediction contract, whatever that is, on the Lakers winning the basketball game. If you ask any ordinary human being if that's sports gambling, it absolutely is, they would think that it is," said the former South Carolina Republican congressman. Mulvaney, whose new coalition is called Gambling Is Not Investing, argued that the Commodities Futures Trading Commission is "set up to regulate markets," but it "is not set up to protect consumers," such as the ones buying contracts on prediction markets, which include Polymarket and Kalshi . The CTFC has argued that it should be the regulator of prediction markets, not state agencies. "Look, I used to be a federal regulator," Mulvaney said. "I ran the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Have nothing but the highest respect for the CFTC , but they're not in the same business as regulating, say, sports gambling." Read more CNBC politics coverage Iran war live updates: U.S. closes embassies in Saudi Arabia, Kuwait Five races to watch on the day the 2026 midterm elections kick off ‘Mistakes were made,’ Grassley tells Noem about Trump’s immigration crackdown Mulvaney also said recent contracts on prediction markets that paid off big for purchasers who predicted the U.S. would invade Iran should be investigated. He also suggested, as members of Congress have, that such activity represents a security risk for the U.S. "If someone's trading in prediction markets on classified information, and our adversaries and our enemies are able to draw information about that ... ...
Read full article at source