Second US appeals court upholds Trump’s immigration detention policy
Entity Intersection Graph
No entity connections available yet for this article.
Original Source
try{ var _=i o; . if(!_||_&&typeof _==="object"&&_.expiry Iran conflict latest: Trump says Iranian negotiators "begging" for peace deal Gold drops amid mixed signals on U.S.-Iran de-escalation efforts Gold dip looks like a buy as central banks step in, Barclays tells investors Investors move back to cash in 2022-style shift, JPM says (South Africa Philippines Nigeria) Second US appeals court upholds Trump’s immigration detention policy By World Published 03/25/2026, 02:09 PM Updated 03/26/2026, 11:31 AM Second US appeals court upholds Trump’s immigration detention policy 0 By Nate Raymond March 25 - A U.S. appeals court on Wednesday endorsed the Trump administration’s policy of subjecting people arrested in its immigration crackdown to mandatory detention without the chance to be released on bond in a ruling that will affect numerous cases in Minnesota and six other states. The 2-1 decision by a panel of the St. Louis-based 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals marked the second time a regional appeals court upheld President Donald Trump’s mass detention policy after hundreds of lower-court judges had declared it unlawful. The 8th Circuit’s decision will affect seven states within its jurisdiction, including Minnesota. Over 400 lawsuits were filed in Minnesota in January alone by people alleging they were wrongly detained during "Operation Metro Surge," the U.S. Department of Justice has said. The Justice Department cited the flood of lawsuits in pushing the 8th Circuit to quickly review the case, which progressed even as the administration wound down the enforcement campaign following the fatal shootings of two U.S. citizens in Minneapolis by immigration agents. "MASSIVE COURT VICTORY against activist judges and for President Trump’s law and order agenda!" U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi declared in a social media post. REINTERPRETING IMMIGRATION LAW Bucking a long-standing interpretation of immigration law, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security last year took the p...
Read full article at source