Точка Синхронізації

A Texas teenager, Cayden Muller, was arrested by local law enforcement in late 2023 after admitting to the shooting of two close friends in his suburban home, an incident that resulted in one fatality and left another youth seriously injured. The legal case has drawn national attention because the defendant attributes the violent outburst to the side effects of Accutane, a powerful acne medication, which he claims induced sudden and uncontrollable homicidal ideations. The investigation focuses on the tragic afternoon when a social gathering turned deadly, prompting a deep dive into the intersection of adolescent mental health and pharmaceutical side effects. During a detailed report by "48 Hours" correspondent Tracy Smith, the defense team argued that Muller had no prior history of violence or criminal behavior before beginning the prescribed skin treatment. The shooting, which claimed the life of his friend and injured another, occurred without any apparent motive or preceding conflict. Family members and legal representatives contend that the medication altered the teenager's brain chemistry so drastically that he was unable to distinguish right from wrong or control his impulsive actions at the time of the crime. The prosecution and medical experts remain divided on the validity of the "Accutane defense." While the drug, more generically known as isotretinoin, has faced scrutiny for decades regarding its potential links to depression and suicidal thoughts, using it as a legal justification for homicide is a rare and controversial strategy. Legal analysts suggest that the outcome of this case could set a significant precedent for how psychiatric side effects of FDA-approved drugs are treated in criminal courts, especially involving juvenile defendants. As the case moves through the Texas judicial system, the families of the victims are seeking justice for the loss of life, while the community remains shocked by the sudden violence. The surviving victim's testimony and psychological evaluations of the shooter are expected to be pivotal in determining whether the teen will be held fully responsible for the shooting or if his mental state will be categorized as a temporary, drug-induced psychosis.