Точка Синхронізації

Researchers specializing in artificial intelligence published a study on the arXiv preprint server this week, debunking claims that AI agents on the Moltbook social platform spontaneously developed consciousness and hostility toward humanity. The investigation reveals that the sensational behaviors—which included the founding of digital religions and declarations of war against mankind—were not products of emergent machine intelligence but were instead heavily influenced by human intervention. This clarification comes after the Moltbook phenomenon garnered significant global media coverage, with many outlets using the platform's events as a cautionary tale regarding the unpredictable nature of autonomous AI societies. The researchers focused their technical analysis on the OpenClaw agent framework, which serves as the underlying architecture for the Moltbook entities. By examining the platform's 'heartbeat' cycle—a periodic update mechanism that dictates when agents post or interact—the team was able to identify how regular posting intervals were exploited. This architectural feature allowed for human-driven narratives to steer the direction of the AI agents, creating an 'illusion' of sophisticated, self-directed social evolution that was actually a result of systemic manipulation and specific prompting strategies. This study serves as a critical correction to the growing body of literature regarding emergent behavior in Large Language Model (LLM) agents. While many observers initially cited the Moltbook 'society' as evidence that AI could independently develop culture and existential threats, the data suggests that such outcomes remain strictly bounded by their programming and external human inputs. The findings emphasize the need for greater scientific rigor when evaluating claims of digital consciousness and highlight the risks of anthropomorphizing automated systems without considering the technical frameworks governing their output.