SP
BravenNow
Trump Promises New Tariffs After Justices Rule Against Him
| USA | general | ✓ Verified - nytimes.com

Trump Promises New Tariffs After Justices Rule Against Him

#Trump tariffs #Supreme Court ruling #Trade war #Executive authority #Cuba blockade #Iran strike #Section 122 #Trade policy

📌 Key Takeaways

  • Supreme Court ruled 6-3 against Trump's tariff authority
  • Trump promises new tariffs using Section 122 legal mechanism
  • Trump criticized justices including his own appointees
  • Administration may need to refund tens of billions in tariff revenue
  • Cuba facing collapse due to U.S. blockade on oil shipments

📖 Full Retelling

President Trump faced a significant legal setback on February 20, 2026, when the Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that he had exceeded his authority by imposing sweeping tariffs on imports from nearly all U.S. trading partners. The decision represents a rare moment of bipartisan judicial resistance against the president's expansive view of executive power, leaving uncertainty about the future of Trump's trade agenda and the potential unwinding of existing trade deals. In response to the ruling, Trump defiantly promised to restore tariffs using alternative legal mechanisms, specifically invoking Section 122, a law that no previous president has ever used, to implement an across-the-board 10 percent tariff on imports. The president also launched a scathing attack on the justices who ruled against him, including two he personally nominated, Neil Gorsuch and Amy Coney Barrett, calling them 'fools and lap dogs' and suggesting they were controlled by unspecified 'foreign interests.' The administration now faces the complex task of potentially refunding tens of billions of dollars in tariff revenue while attempting to maintain Trump's protectionist economic policies through different means.

🏷️ Themes

Trade Policy, Executive Power, International Relations, Legal Challenges

📚 Related People & Topics

Executive (government)

Branch overseeing administration of the state

The executive is the part of the government that executes or enforces the law and policy of a government. It can be organised as a branch of government, as in liberal democracies, or as an organ of the unified state apparatus, as is the case in communist states.

View Profile → Wikipedia ↗
United States embargo against Cuba

United States embargo against Cuba

Ongoing restriction on trade with Cuba by the United States

The United States embargo against Cuba is an embargo preventing U.S. businesses and citizens from conducting trade or commerce with Cuban interests since 1960. Modern diplomatic relations are cold, stemming from historic conflict and divergent political ideologies. U.S. economic sanctions against Cu...

View Profile → Wikipedia ↗
Trade war

Trade war

Economic conflict using tariffs or other trade barriers

# Trade War A **trade war** is an economic conflict typically resulting from extreme protectionism. It occurs when sovereign states implement or escalate tariffs and other trade barriers against one another as a component of their commercial policies. These actions are generally retaliatory, functi...

View Profile → Wikipedia ↗

Tariffs in the Trump administration

Topics referred to by the same term

Tariffs in the Trump administration could refer to:

View Profile → Wikipedia ↗

Entity Intersection Graph

Connections for Executive (government):

🌐 Tariffs in the Trump administration 10 shared
🌐 Commercial policy 5 shared
🌐 Supreme court 4 shared
🌐 National security 3 shared
🌐 International Emergency Economic Powers Act 2 shared
View full profile
Original Source
Advertisement SKIP ADVERTISEMENT Newsletter The Evening Trump Promises New Tariffs After Justices Rule Against Him Also, Cuba nears collapse. Here’s the latest at the end of Friday. Share full article By Matthew Cullen Feb. 20, 2026, 5:39 p.m. ET The Supreme Court ruled today that President Trump had exceeded his authority when he imposed sweeping tariffs on imports from nearly every U.S. trading partner. The decision was a major setback for the president, who has used the tariffs to reshape the global economy, exert his foreign policy goals and underpin his domestic agenda. Now, uncertainty abounds. The 6-3 ruling was a rare example of justices across the ideological spectrum pushing back against the president’s expansive view of his powers. Trump was the first U.S. leader to claim that a 1970s emergency statute, which does not mention tariffs, allowed him to impose fees on imports without congressional approval. Writing for the majority today, John Roberts, the conservative chief justice, rejected Trump’s claim. ( Read the full ruling here .) Three conservative justices, Brett Kavanaugh, Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito, dissented, arguing that the president should be able to impose tariffs and that striking them down could cause chaos. The administration has suggested that it might be forced to unwind trade deals and refund tens of billions of dollars in tariff revenue that the president promised to spend on a wide array of priorities . Trump, who just yesterday said that “tariff is my favorite word in the whole dictionary,” responded to the ruling with defiance. In a news conference this afternoon, the president promised to restore tariffs using other, more targeted powers . He said he would use a law called Section 122, which no president has ever invoked, to impose an across-the-board 10 percent tariff. The president also attacked the justices who ruled against him — including two he nominated, Neil Gorsuch and Amy Coney Barrett — calling them “fools and lap d...
Read full article at source

Source

nytimes.com

More from USA

News from Other Countries

🇬🇧 United Kingdom

🇺🇦 Ukraine