US Supreme Court won’t revive NRA free speech suit against NY ex-official
📌 Key Takeaways
- {"type":"skipped","reason":"older_than_3_days"}
📚 Related People & Topics
Supreme court
Highest court in a jurisdiction
In most legal jurisdictions, a supreme court, also known as a court of last resort, apex court, high (or final) court of appeal, and court of final appeal, is the highest court within the hierarchy of courts. Broadly speaking, the decisions of a supreme court are binding on all other courts in a nat...
Entity Intersection Graph
Connections for Supreme court:
🌐
Tariffs in the Trump administration
25 shared
👤
Donald Trump
19 shared
🌐
Tariff
16 shared
🌐
Commercial policy
12 shared
Mentioned Entities
Original Source
try{ var _=i o; . if(!_||_&&typeof _==="object"&&_.expiry Dystopian AI report sinks payment and software stocks Gold prices rise on Trump tariff jitters; Russia sold gold holding in January These 2 chip stocks are new Top Picks at Citi Dow slides 700 points on Trump tariff turmoil, Nasdaq falls on AI research report (South Africa Philippines Nigeria) US Supreme Court won’t revive NRA free speech suit against NY ex-official By Reuters Economy Published 02/23/2026, 09:47 AM Updated 02/23/2026, 11:48 AM US Supreme Court won’t revive NRA free speech suit against NY ex-official 0 By John Kruzel WASHINGTON, Feb 23 - The U.S. Supreme Court declined on Monday to revive the National Rifle Association’s lawsuit accusing a former New York state official of coercing banks and insurers to avoid doing business with the gun rights group. The justices in 2024 had reinstated the group’s lawsuit accusing Maria Vullo, the former superintendent of New York’s Department of Financial Services, of violating its free speech rights under the U.S. Constitution’s First Amendment. But they declined to do so a second time after a lower court again dismissed the lawsuit. The NRA’s 2018 lawsuit accused Vullo of unlawfully retaliating against it for its constitutionally protected gun rights advocacy by targeting it with an "implicit censorship regime" following a 2018 mass shooting in which 17 people were killed at a high school in Parkland, Florida. The NRA won a unanimous Supreme Court ruling in May 2024 that revived its suit after its dismissal by lower courts. The justices in that decision held that the First Amendment "prohibits government officials from wielding their power selectively to punish or suppress speech, directly or, as alleged here, through private intermediaries." But the Supreme Court in that ruling did not address whether Vullo was immune from being sued under a legal defense called qualified immunity, which shields officials from civil litigation in certain circumstances. The...
Read full article at source