SP
BravenNow
The decision to euthanize a Monrovia bear was both cruel and lazy
| USA | general | ✓ Verified - latimes.com

The decision to euthanize a Monrovia bear was both cruel and lazy

#Monrovia bear #euthanized #animal welfare #wildlife #cruelty #decision #Monrovia

📌 Key Takeaways

  • The Monrovia bear was euthanized.
  • The decision was described as cruel and lazy.
  • Authorities failed to find a better solution.
  • The outcome was avoidable and tragic.
  • Public scrutiny is likely to follow.

📖 Full Retelling

'This decision was made despite local officials calling for the relocation of the animal. Who did they kill this bear for?,' writes an L.A. Times reader.

🏷️ Themes

Animal welfare, Euthanasia, Monrovia

📚 Related People & Topics

Monrovia

Monrovia

Capital, chief port, and the largest city of Liberia

Monrovia is the capital and largest city of Liberia, located on the Atlantic coast at Cape Mesurado in Montserrado County. It serves as the country's political, administrative, economic, and cultural center. According to the 2022 census, the city has a population of approximately 1.76 million, while...

View Profile → Wikipedia ↗

Entity Intersection Graph

No entity connections available yet for this article.

Mentioned Entities

Monrovia

Monrovia

Capital, chief port, and the largest city of Liberia

}
Original Source
March 20, 2026 6 AM PT 2 min Click here to listen to this article Share via Close extra sharing options Email Facebook X LinkedIn Threads Reddit WhatsApp Copy Link URL Copied! Print 0:00 0:00 1x This is read by an automated voice. Please report any issues or inconsistencies here . p]:text-cms-story-body-color-text clearfix mb-10 md:max-w-170 md:mx-auto" data-subscriber-content> To the editor : I am horrified and saddened to learn that the California Department of Fish and Wildlife authorized the killing of a mother bear in Monrovia ( “Bear euthanized, her cubs left orphaned, over objections of Monrovia city leaders,” March 17). Why does the department continue to punish animals for doing nothing more than existing? This decision was made despite local officials calling for the relocation of the animal. Who did they kill this bear for? It was beyond cruel. Pressures from habitat loss, climate change and other types of human encroachment are forcing bears and other animals into suburban areas more and more frequently. This is not the fault of the animals. They are surviving in the habitat that is available to them. Now the bear’s two cubs must be rehabilitated and rereleased into the wild. While we hope for the best, those cubs face a more difficult future without the guidance of their mother. The resources to rewild the cubs would have been put to better use by just relocating the mother bear and cubs to another area to begin with. Advertisement I appreciate the work that the department does to enforce laws that protect our wildlife, but I am baffled by this cruel and, frankly, lazy decision to kill the Monrovia bear. Many Californians are heartbroken over the loss of this beautiful mama bear. CDFW must do better for us and our wildlife. Judie Mancuso, Laguna Beach This writer is founder and president of animal advocacy nonprofit Social Compassion in Legislation. More to Read Voices Letters to the Editor: Cesar Chavez was a hero to many, but the allegations are horri...
Read full article at source

Source

latimes.com

More from USA

News from Other Countries

🇬🇧 United Kingdom

🇺🇦 Ukraine