● ImportantWorld1 outlet covering thisCalibrating

Singham-linked nonprofits fight House subpoenas, accuse lawmakers of McCarthy-era ‘witch hunt’

First publishedAug 21, 10:33 UTC
Last updatedAug 21, 11:14 UTC · just now ago
11 outletFox News Latest
1 outlets over time — hover a bar for its window & outletslast updated
Singham-linked nonprofits fight House subpoenas, accuse lawmakers of McCarthy-era ‘witch hunt’
● Story signals

How strong is this topic?

6.0/10Significanceimpact & urgency
6.0/10Source trustoutlet authority
1Outletsindependent sources

Significance weighs impact, urgency & coverage breadth · Source trust is the outlets' average authority · more outlets means a more confirmed story.

Answer

Two nonprofits subpoenaed in a House Ways and Means Committee investigation into communist tech tycoon Neville Roy Singham's funding network have formally objected to the congressional subpoenas, accusing lawmakers of reviving "Red Scare" tactics to target them because of their political views.In letters from their attorneys to the committee, New York City-based BreakThrough News, a pro-China media outlet, and Peoples Forum Inc., a socialist activist group, argued the subpoenas violate the First Amendment.They claim lawmakers are targeting their free speech, journalism and political advocacy rather than conducting a legitimate tax-law investigation.In a statement to Fox News Digital, House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Jason Smith, R-Mo., defended the investigation and criticized the organizations' refusal to comply with the July 21 subpoenas."Make no mistake: Compliance with a congressional subpoena isn't optional, and the Committee will use all tools it has available to investigate whether foreign actors are exploiting our tax code to sow chaos and create division," Smith said.HOUSE PANEL SUBPOENAS 3 LEFT-WING GROUPS IN PROBE OF $39M TIED TO MARXIST TYCOON NEVILLE SINGHAMIn letters, attorneys for both organizations wrote in identical language, "A witch-hunt is not a valid legislative purpose," arguing the committee's public statements reflect "the language of the Red Scare."Both organizations argue they are not required to comply with the subpoenas as presently framed, saying the committee's demands are too broad and seek information protected by the First Amendment. They leave open the possibility of responding if the committee narrows its demands.The two responses, dated Aug.

Reported by 1 outlet Fox News Latest. See all sources ↓

Two nonprofits subpoenaed in a House Ways and Means Committee investigation into communist tech tycoon Neville Roy Singham's funding network have formally objected to the congressional subpoenas, accusing lawmakers of reviving "Red Scare" tactics to target them because of their political views.In letters from their attorneys to the committee, New York City-based BreakThrough News, a pro-China media outlet, and Peoples Forum Inc., a socialist activist group, argued the subpoenas violate the First Amendment.They claim lawmakers are targeting their free speech, journalism and political advocacy rather than conducting a legitimate tax-law investigation.In a statement to Fox News Digital, House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Jason Smith, R-Mo., defended the investigation and criticized the organizations' refusal to comply with the July 21 subpoenas."Make no mistake: Compliance with a congressional subpoena isn't optional, and the Committee will use all tools it has available to investigate whether foreign actors are exploiting our tax code to sow chaos and create division," Smith said.HOUSE PANEL SUBPOENAS 3 LEFT-WING GROUPS IN PROBE OF $39M TIED TO MARXIST TYCOON NEVILLE SINGHAMIn letters, attorneys for both organizations wrote in identical language, "A witch-hunt is not a valid legislative purpose," arguing the committee's public statements reflect "the language of the Red Scare."Both organizations argue they are not required to comply with the subpoenas as presently framed, saying the committee's demands are too broad and seek information protected by the First Amendment. They leave open the possibility of responding if the committee narrows its demands.The two responses, dated Aug. 7 and shared on the organizations' social media accounts, closely mirror each other in tone and substance. Mara Verheyden-Hilliard, co-founder and executive director of the Partnership for Civil Justice Fund, a far-left nonprofit based in Washington, D.C., signed the letter from the People's Forum.

Read the full report at Fox News Latest

Why it matters

A world story we're tracking; its significance and source trust firm up as more outlets confirm it.

In brief
What's the story?
Two nonprofits subpoenaed in a House Ways and Means Committee investigation into communist tech tycoon Neville Roy Singham's funding network have formally objected to the congressional subpoenas, accusing lawmakers of reviving "Red Scare" tactics to target them because of their political views.In letters from their attorneys to the committee, New York City-based BreakThrough News, a pro-China media outlet, and Peoples Forum Inc., a socialist activist group, argued the subpoenas violate the First Amendment.They claim lawmakers are targeting their free speech, journalism and political advocacy rather than conducting a legitimate tax-law investigation.In a statement to Fox News Digital, House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Jason Smith, R-Mo., defended the investigation and criticized the organizations' refusal to comply with the July 21 subpoenas."Make no mistake: Compliance with a congressional subpoena isn't optional, and the Committee will use all tools it has available to investigate whether foreign actors are exploiting our tax code to sow chaos and create division," Smith said.HOUSE PANEL SUBPOENAS 3 LEFT-WING GROUPS IN PROBE OF $39M TIED TO MARXIST TYCOON NEVILLE SINGHAMIn letters, attorneys for both organizations wrote in identical language, "A witch-hunt is not a valid legislative purpose," arguing the committee's public statements reflect "the language of the Red Scare."Both organizations argue they are not required to comply with the subpoenas as presently framed, saying the committee's demands are too broad and seek information protected by the First Amendment. They leave open the possibility of responding if the committee narrows its demands.The two responses, dated Aug.
How widely is it covered?
1 outlet, average source rating 6.0/10.
When was it last updated?
just now ago.
Different angles across outlets
Coverage map

How outlets are framing the same story

Here's how each outlet is covering the story — compare their headlines and timing at a glance.

  • Coverage card1 outlet
    1Coverage
    Scouting report

    Singham-linked nonprofits fight House subpoenas, accuse lawmakers of McCarthy-era ‘witch hunt’

    Sources1
    TypeCoverage
    Fox News Latest
Related in the knowledge graph
Sources (1)
Avg source rating 6.0/10
Processing cluster
A1A2A3B1B2B3
Share this article
Summarize with AI (opens AI chat with article URL · Gemini: prompt copied to clipboard)