Trump Wants the M.M.R. Vaccine Split Into Three Separate Shots. Doctors Say It’s a Bad Idea.
First publishedAug 11, 22:31 UTC
Last updatedAug 13, 00:14 UTC · 11m ago
10 outlets over time — hover a bar for its window & outletslast updated







Answer
There is no evidence that the combination shot for measles, mumps and rubella is dangerous or that splitting it into its three components is any safer or more effective, vaccine experts said.
Reported by 10 outlets — NYT Home, The Hill, Al Jazeera, Ars Technica, SFGate Bay Area, and 1 more. See all sources ↓
Read the full report at NYT Home ↗
Why it matters
10 outlets are covering this world story — one to watch as reporting develops.
In brief
- What's the story?
- There is no evidence that the combination shot for measles, mumps and rubella is dangerous or that splitting it into its three components is any safer or more effective, vaccine experts said.
- How widely is it covered?
- 10 outlets, average source rating 6.8/10.
- When was it last updated?
- 11m ago.
Different angles across outlets
Coverage map
How outlets are framing the same story
Here's how each outlet is covering the story — compare their headlines and timing at a glance.
- Coverage card6 outlets1CoverageScouting report
Trump Wants the M.M.R. Vaccine Split Into Three Separate Shots. Doctors Say It’s a Bad Idea.
Sources6TypeCoverageNYT Home
The Hill
Al Jazeera
Ars Technica
SFGate Bay Area
Seattle Times
Related in the knowledge graph
organizationBad Idea.. ThereorganizationM.M.R. Vaccine Split IntoorganizationSay ItorganizationThree Separate Shots. DoctorsorganizationTrump Wants
Sources (10)
Avg source rating 6.8/10NYT Home9
The Hill7
Al Jazeera7
The Hill7
The Hill7
Ars Technica7
SFGate Bay Area6
Seattle Times6
Seattle Times6
Seattle Times6
Processing cluster
A1A2A3B1B2B3